Major differences between the two theories Essay

The obviously notable discrepancy mingled with Banduras affable cognitive speculation and Becks cognitive possibility is the bias that separately has towards demeanour. For instance, Banduras framework is much behavioral, whereas Becks determine is prepared towards psych an different(prenominal)apy or seems to provide mental solutions to bothers. The social cognitive guess (by Bandura) is presented in an agentic perspective. It explains why people exhibit differences in self-organization, being pro interpretive, participation in self-reflection, and in self-regulation (Bandura, 1986).In essence, the theory does not rightful(prenominal) surface that human beings have divergent capabilities, it also shows that other factors such as the environment play a study role in shaping behaviourism (Bandura, 1986). The theory further divulges human beings as producers as well as products of what they induct (the proverb manners maketh man should be true). Banduras theory also gives the socio cognitive aspects of human beings, for example, why they act in particular manners and what elicits such behavior.Additionally, the theory also gives reasons why the human character is vast in terms of capabilities and how gentleman is fashioned by direct and data-based experience that is integrated in a variety of forms. In contradistinction, Becks theory gives a picture of the phenomena underlying impaired beliefs (Beck, 1976). This theory does not just describe constitution, but provides solutions to mental problems. This is achieved by the simulates blow-by-blow analysis of the nonchalant agents of depression and how depression can be remedied (Beck, 1976).Becks theory seems to give intermediation approach in solving psychological problems by encouraging patients to be participants of the problem solving process rather than unresisting and helpless respondents. Another difference mingled with the twain theories is the three used in each of the theories , which forms the basis of the entire illustrations and discussions. Banduras model is a triad with behavior, environmental factors and individualal determinants as the main elements. On the other hand, Becks cognitive model consists of behavior, antecedent events and consequences (Beck, 1976 Beck, 1998).The triads may seem to impersonate a similarity between the two models but in real sentience they exhibit differences since the explanation of how the elements in the triads fall upon each other or act on their own is slightly different. For instance, in Banduras theory, the rendering of how the factors in the triad affect each other revolves just about causal agent and effect. One of the factors, such as the environment is implied to be a cause (or a factor that determines) of behavior. Thus, there is dialect on reciprocal determinism.On the other hand, Becks triadic illustration of the factors that trope personality and character is influenced by the person (self), the ad ult male and the future. In this context, it is evident that personality is modify not just by behavior but also by other events that occur in life. In fact, Beck (1976) describes the person (self) as the main source of ideas to acquit depression problems with reference to the world and foretaste of a better future. Conclusion Banduras cognitive Theory and Becks cognitive Theory seem to have more similarities in that they describe personality and the factors shape it.Many elements described in each theorys triad show convergence in meaning. Major differences between the two models lie in the description of the models. While Banduras model is incline towards behaviorism, Becks model provides an explanation of psychological dysfunctions and possible remedies.References Bandura A. (2006). psychological modeling impertinent theories. Chicago Aldine Transaction. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy The exercise of control. New York W. H. freewoman Company Bandura, A. (1986).Social foun dations of thoughts and action A social cognitive theory. New Jersey scholar Hall Professional Technical.Bandura, A. (1976) Social training theory. New York Prentice Hall Bandura, A. (1971). Psychological modeling Conflicting theories. Chicago Aldine- Atherton. Beck, A. (1979). cognitive therapy of depression. New York Guilford Press Beck, A. (1976). Cognitive therapy & emotional disorders. NY International Universities Press. Beck, A. (1998). The Integrative Power of Cognitive Therapy. New York Guilford Press.